Justice Musa Liman fixed the date after counsel for the Inspector-General of Police, CSP Audu Garba, informed the court that the police had just filed a further counter affidavit in response to the singer’s further affidavit served on them in the last adjourned date.
Rosemary Hamza, who appeared for Speed Darlington, said she was yet to be served to know how to respond appropriately.
The artiste, who urged the court to declare that his arrest and detention violated his fundamental rights as guaranteed by the 1999 Constitution, sought four orders.
In the suit filed by Deji Adeyanju, he sought an order directing the I-G to immediately and unconditionally release him from the detention facility where he is being kept.
Alternatively, he sought an order mandating and compelling the I-G to produce him before the court to enable the court to inquire into the circumstances constituting grounds of his arrest and detention and where it deems fit, admit him to bail.
He also sought an order directing the respondent to pay the applicant the sum of N300,000,000.00 only as general, exemplary and aggravated damages for their unlawful and continued detention since 2024 till date.
In the affidavit deposed by Esther Eyisi, a secretary in the law firm, she alleged that Speed Darlington was first arrested on October 4, 2024, for allegedly defaming Burna Boy, a popular musician.
She said he was illegally detained for five days and subjected to severe torture and maltreatment without being formally charged to a court of competent jurisdiction.
Eyisi averred that the artiste was eventually granted bail by the police after spending five days under inhumane conditions.
According to her, the applicant was arrested and detained by officers of the respondent because he allegedly jumped administrative bail on November 27, 2024.
This, she said, was in spite of notification from her client about his medical emergency and his inability to report on the scheduled date and obtaining the permission of the officers of the respondent to travel to Owerri, Imo for a performance.
She said the continuous detention of Speed Darlington without arraignment contravened his constitutional rights, describing him as the breadwinner in his family.
Read Also: ‘No mercy next time’ — Burna Boy warns after Darlington’s prison release
But in the police counter affidavit deposed to by SP David Atama, he averred that on September 24, 2024, his office received a petition from the nominal complainant, Damini Ogulu, popularly known as Burna Boy, through his counsel G.C. Ijioma of Rockfold Chambers.
Atama said Burna Boy alleged threat to his life, and intimidation, among his followers, which is contrary to Section 24 of the Cybercrime Prohibition, Prevention Act, 2015, as amended.
The officer alleged that in the course of the investigation, Speed Darlington was invited and he came and volunteered a written statement and admitted the commission of the offence.
But in the further affidavit, Speed Darlington said he had never admitted to committing any offence.
The singer said the allegations in the counter affidavit were false and misleading as Burna Boy himself had confirmed the allegation which is now the subject of a brute joke that several personalities have been making publicly in respect of the said Burna Boy.
He said he had never jumped bail, contrary to the submission of the police.
Meanwhile, Speed Darlington on Jan. 15, admitted to a N20 million bail with one surety by Justice Ekerete Akpan of a sister court in Abuja.
Justice Akpan gave the order in a ruling on the singer’s bail application moved by his lawyer, Marshall Abubakar after he pleaded not guilty to a two-count charge bordering on alleged cybercrime.
The court subsequently fixed March 19 for parties to adopt their processes.